Q: I am a reporter for a weekly newsletter that almost always quotes people on background -- for example, you might be quoted as "an advice-giving source."
Now, I want to jump into daily journalism (like a 3-year-old wants to jump into a mud puddle). But all of my recent clips seem sort of ... shady, and my previous experience was at a small 5-day. What should I do? Can I include a note on my clips, explaining this unique set of circumstances, or rely on my ancient 5-day clips, or spend my weekends building a stable of bylined freelance clips? Or should I go teach high-school English somewhere, and maybe contribute to journalism from the other end?
Thanks for answering! I am a big fan!
Colleen
A: And your writing makes me a fan of yours. You're funny!
Shady, indeed. And I'd say it is far better to quote an "advice-giving source" than a "dumb-as-dirt source."
I'd use the five-day newspaper clips and freshen them as fast as you can with freelanced stuff.
It doesn't help to submit off-the-mark clips and then a note explaining why they are that way.
Also, be selective about your aim. Apply to live openings and, if you're getting no response, aim smaller.
