Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Wall Street Walks Away From Newspapers
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Chip on Your Shoulder

Home > Reporting, Writing & Editing > Chip on Your Shoulder
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, RSSRSS, Subscribe via e-mail
Chip Scanlan
Sharing the writing life with Chip Scanlan.

SERIES
BOOKS

"Reporting and Writing: Basics for the 21st Century"
Oxford University Press



"The Holly Wreath Man"
Andrews McMeel Publishing



ESSAYS

"My Cancer Time Bomb"
Salon.com

"Leave Me Alone, AARP"
Salon.com

"The Hardest Habit to Kick: A Confession"
National Public Radio

"The Only Honest Man"
River Teeth: A Journal of Nonfiction Narrative

"Reading the Paper"
The American Scholar

REPORTING

"Made in the Shade"
Creative Loafing

"Mass Appeal"
Catholic Digest

"The Liberation of Tam Minh Pham"
The Washington Post Magazine

FICTION

Holly Wreaths Across America
Online map of the newspapers in which "The Holly Wreath Man" has been published.

Mystery @ Elf Camp
with Katharine Fair

"The Needle"
A Novel in Progress

"Mad Looper"
MississippiReview.com


Ask Chip: Should My Writing Turn the Other Cheek?
 
Hey Chip,

One of my producers says my writing is sometimes too "cheeky." I do plead guilty to attempting an upbeat and witty style, but she only wants these for her kickers. Any thoughts or suggestions?

One of my cheeky leads:

"Former White House aide Scooter Libby got some help from the Oval Office today."

Stephen
Associate Producer


Stephen,

I wish I had better news.

First, let’s look at your producer’s complaint about your writing being too "cheeky."

Cheeky is an adjective meaning "impudent or irreverent, typically in an amusing or endearing way."

ASK CHIP

To get your question answered on this page, send it to Chip. Please include your full name in your message. If you prefer that your surname not be published, please indicate that.

Click here to sign up to receive Chip on Your Shoulder by e-mail newsletter.
Its origins are biblical. "Smiting on the cheek was accounted a grievous injury and insult (Job 16:10; Lam. 3:30; Micah 5:1)," according to Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary.

Its secular origins echo its religious beginnings. Its first use, estimated in 1386, had Latin origins: pudere, a present participle, meaning "to cause shame."

In politics, the opportunity to cause shame is like shooting metal ducks at a carnival.

Ready, Aim ... The Hazards of the Cliché

But your aim must be precise, and this one fails in that regard, according to my colleague Scott Libin, a veteran broadcast journalist, guardian of style, Poynter Online managing editor and the first person I sought to respond to your question. His take:

"The example provided isn't clever enough to compensate for its imprecision. In fact, saying the help came from the Oval Office is more cliché than cheek."

I applaud your effort at creativity. But don’t let cheekiness drift into cliché.
 
Clichés often represent the first layer of thought.  Dig a little deeper.  Say it in a way you haven't heard before. 

Thanks for asking.

Chip

Posted by Chip Scanlan 12:12 PM

Read More In This Series:
Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers