Poynter Online
Go


Top Story

Putting Voters in the Analyst's Seat
Most Recent Articles
Most E-mailed
Recent Comments
Recent Tags
Community Activity

Poynter Training
Poynter Seminars
Small, in-person training experiences.
News University
Today's most popular courses on NewsU, Poynter's e-learning site for journalists.
Webinars
Our online classroom is just a click away. Learn more.
All Webinars

Centerpieces

Home > Leadership & Management > Centerpieces
Tools: Text Sizeor, Print, Subscribe via e-mail
Alicia Shepard
Poynter Online Centerpiece stories



The Myth of Watergate, Woodward and Bernstein
Thirty-five years ago this weekend, one of the most famous myths of journalism was born.

On June 17, 1972, around 2 a.m., five men in business suits, wearing surgical gloves and carrying sophisticated bugging equipment along with nearly $2,300 in cash broke into the Democratic national headquarters at the Watergate hotel. Twenty-six months later on Aug. 9, 1974, President Richard Nixon was forced to resign for his role in covering up the break-in, and the country began its dance with post-traumatic stress syndrome.

RELATED RESOURCES
Site for Shepard's book:
"Woodward and Bernstein: Life in the Shadow of Watergate"

Excerpt from the book

"Reporter Pads and Book Galleys: Documenting Woodstein"
By Alicia Shepard

The American public had never experienced a president resigning in ignominy. The scandal was such a devastating trauma to the national psyche that it became easiest for Americans to grasp Watergate through simple stories, or myths. One such story involves journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, and their trusted source, Deep Throat.

Woodward and Bernstein, as most everyone knows, were two young, unknown metro reporters for The Washington Post in 1972. Woodward had only been at the Post for nine months when the break-in occurred. The pair worked on the first-day, front-page main story, along with eight other Post reporters. They did not even get a byline. But the story clearly ignited their journalistic juices, for it was "Woodstein" that latched onto the mystery of the five burglars and their ties to Nixon and refused to let go until it was solved.

Over time, the myth has grown and is oft-repeated, especially by journalists less than 40, that Woodward and Bernstein with the help of Deep Throat took down a president.

Just this week, the following appeared on Boston station WBUR's Web site: "Carl Bernstein was half the investigative reporting team of Woodward and Bernstein that brought down a president in the Watergate scandal."

But Woodward and Bernstein did not bring down a president.

The late Katharine Graham, the highly respected Washington Post publisher during Watergate, knew that. Shortly after Nixon resigned, she hand wrote a letter thanking the pair from her summer home on Martha's Vineyard. In the letter, which is in the Woodward-Bernstein Watergate archives at the University of Texas, Graham wrote:

"I concede all the blessings we must all concede -- incredible amounts of luck, sources willing & even finally a few eager to talk & help. I concede the role of the courts, grand juries & congressional committees. We didn't bring him down."

But then, it is a much better story to romanticize Woodward, now 64, and Bernstein, 63, and turn them into David-like characters who took down the nation's Goliath with a slingshot fashioned out of a newspaper. That myth was cemented after Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman -- the equivalent today of Brad Pitt and George Clooney -- portrayed Woodward and Bernstein in the 1976 classic movie "All the President's Men."

But the truth is always more complicated, complex and nuanced than movies or myths.

The reality is that Woodward and Bernstein should be applauded for doing consistently strong reporting throughout the fall of 1972 when Nixon ran for re-election. Yes, the Post led the way. But other media such as the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, The Washington Star, Time, Newsweek and CBS also did good work.

Jack Nelson and Ron Ostrow of the Los Angeles Times got the first hard-hitting, on-the-record interview with one of the peripheral burglars. Much of Woodward and Bernstein's early reporting was attributed to anonymous sources. The power of the Los Angeles Times' Oct. 5, 1972, story was that it ran a verbatim, taped account of Alfred C. Baldwin III, a former FBI agent who was considered a major government witness.

"The Baldwin story was a big deal," Nelson said in an interview for "Woodward and Bernstein: Life in the Shadow of Watergate." "It created a hell of a story because you had an eyewitness talking. It was a big explosion at the time. It was not an 'informed source or official.' It put a face on the Watergate story."

In the first six months after the break-in, the Post produced 201 staff-written stories. But other news organizations were also in the mix, which is generally forgotten. Again, due to the astounding longevity of Redford's "All the President's Men." Between June 17, 1972, and Dec. 31, 1972, The New York Times ran 99 staff-written stories, and the Los Angeles Times published 45 staff-written stories, according to Louis Liebovich's book "Richard Nixon, Watergate, and the Press."

The story really turned a corner on Oct. 27 and 31, 1972, when CBS ran two special Watergate reports. The first was nearly 15 minutes out of a 22-minute broadcast -- the nearly unprecedented equivalent of a newspaper turning two-thirds of its front page over to one story. The second was chopped down to eight minutes after the Nixon administration leaned on CBS and complained about running a negative story so close to the November election. CBS brought the story to a national audience, many of whom knew little about Watergate because of spotty press coverage by news organizations outside the Beltway. In October, a Gallup poll indicated that 48 percent of the country did not recognize the word "Watergate."

In the mid-1970s, the former Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee told the late author David Halberstam that CBS anchor Walter Cronkite made the story legitimate when he reported it. "No longer was it the liberal Washington Post running a story to somehow get Nixon," Bradlee said. "If Cronkite said it was news, it's news. Cronkite's story had an effect on provincial editors. And from then on that began to legitimize the story. It began to get better play."

What the press -- not just Woodward and Bernstein -- did best during Watergate and still does best today is keep important issues alive by shining an aggressive spotlight on them. As much as they might love to, reporters and editors don't have the power to hold grand juries, take depositions or issue subpoenas or search warrants.

During Watergate, the courts, the FBI and the Congress -- especially after televising 237 hours of the Senate Watergate hearings -- all played key roles in the president's ultimate demise. Woodward and Bernstein don't dispute this; they have pointed out that events do not happen in a vacuum. Graham agreed.

"But I believe if the story pre-election & post hadn't continued (burglar and former CIA/Nixon security man James W.) McCord might well not have written his letter," wrote Graham.

McCord, one of the five burglars, faced a long jail sentence. Not willing to be the fall guy, he wrote an explosive letter on March 23, 1973, to Judge John J. Sirica. The letter revealed that there was much more to the break-in than the judge knew.

"But it was still an extraordinary, gutsy, hard, brilliant piece of journalism & I want to say this to you both despite all the accompanying crap that has fallen all over us & especially you," wrote Graham. "Lastly, you've both made it fun & we've all kept the demon pomposity in moderate if far from complete control."

No one should take away any credit from Woodward and Bernstein, whose lives went on to be defined by their role in Watergate. But the drama that concluded with the early departure of the nation's 37th president included a few other key characters as well.

Posted by Alicia Shepard 4:06 PM Aug 7, 2007
Tools:
Comment, e-mail, Permalink, Share
Recent Comments:
Myth of Watergate There are leaders and there are followers. Hardly ever can... More.
Read All Comments (8 comments)
Username
Password
New User? Signup Now
Poynter Careers